Advertising bad pics?

[Hooters]

Sorry Pimp... But the girl on the left in the blue shirt looks like a minor to me.

This stuff is questionable!

And Im not gonna reveal the member's name and board where this was posted in the first place.

[rdhouston]

Originally Posted by Hooters

Sorry Pimp... But the girl on the left in the blue shirt looks like a minor to me.

This stuff is questionable!

And Im not gonna reveal the member's name and board where this was posted in the first place.

This stuff appears on the majority of image hosting sites and also sharing sites. It is not actually kiddie porn but adult actors that look young. This is done for the express purpose of luring people to teen sites. It is only shock value and usually only is conjured up in the minds of sick people that want the girls to look like children. but they are not. they take you to different teen fetish sites, once you are there you'll see they are not kids. It's just good marketing, thats it.

[Hooters]

Originally Posted by rdhouston

This stuff appears on the majority of image hosting sites and also sharing sites. It is not actually kiddie porn but adult actors that look young. This is done for the express purpose of luring people to teen sites. It is only shock value and usually only is conjured up in the minds of sick people that want the girls to look like children. but they are not. they take you to different teen fetish sites, once you are there you'll see they are not kids. It's just good marketing, thats it.

Thnx for the reply... I came to that conclusion myself and I dont want to put Pimp's hosting service down in anyway, because its a good and fast service.

But I just cant relate myself to minor content if any and/or 18+ models who dress up to look like minors, just to lure some sick individuals to their site.

Call it good marketing or false advertising... Still sick stuff IMHO