![]() |
What is the idea of all the "exposing" posts?
Quote:
The "exposing" thing isn't really anything I've ever gotten in to. I get my rush from going to a nearby adult nude 'camp'....but as an outsider to the "exposing" genre, I'm just wondering.... Why is there a need bring up anyone's legit name or posting official ID's...? Wouldn't someone be just as "exposed" having their picture on here in the first place...? And, certainly, having a picture of an License or Work ID isn't a definitive identification (given image editing these day) and how is showing a License equal to permission to display their image...? Then again, I don't understand Clown Porn or Furries either... |
Quote:
You seem well versed, so I will presume you know of candaulism..., called so after King Candaules who is notable for this practice? For those who aren't sure, here's a quick read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candaulism This is when a man derives his pleasure from exposing his wife to others in carnal pleasure. It is about revealing someone - typically surreptitiously, but in common jargon it can also be inclusive where both partners are exhibitionists. For myself and many other candaulist, we seek validation that our partner is desirable by inviting the opinion of others. Most men I know LOVE to hear how hot or sexy their own woman is. It enhances our appreciation of our partner / wife / girlfriend. There is also a very particular adrenaline rush which overcomes a husband when he sees OTHER PEOPLE reposting his girl's photos - it is that moment of supreme validation and also of losing control! That loss of control feeling becomes addictive and the owner / boyfriend/ husband posts more, TRYING to get more of his photos "picked up" by those who post and repost as much as indexes and search bots. I was/ am a candaulist, and my ex-wife was a witting partner in it. It was way more fun to have her buy-in... I have kinks but I am not a creep! The consequence is that you can google image search my wife's name + "nude" and the first 5 or 6 rows of images are her photos from over the the 20-year span when we shared "her" photos. I put "her" in quotes because we shared the copyright fully, they are mine as much as hers. From the very beginning when ever we posted photos online I was careful to include the same specific tags and made effort to compose the photo titles and descriptions to include her name. Having been inside this candaulism world since before the internet (my ex-wife and I shared photos since before digital sharing was an option and even fucked in front of people a few times) I can assert that very many of the men out there who "expose" are "losers" in the colloquial sense regarding relationships and do this to derive a sense of sexual control. Having no partner in their life who will do, many turn to collecting and propagating the distribution of material. There is a sense of inclusion for them, into a community of like-minded hobbyists. Every reposting validates the previous submitter as well as the current and they include themselves interactively through propagation! That seems to be the supply and demand of it. I personally enjoy collecting photos and videos of average common people who appeal to me. This collecting hobby over time has paid off to where now I recognize a good number of woman who have been shared or exposed. Through my experience I have indeed met men who have a vindictive or punishment streak in their collecting and posting - they feel like they are part of something bigger than themself. For me personally it is like collecting trading cards - something we did as kids with various bubble-gum or candy packages - think of sports cards collecting. There is now an entire sub culture of "Exposure Manifesto" exposers who believe that it is their duty to perpetuate the spreading of any women's photos who get drawn into this world. Having a name with the face and body is integral to this, I think you see now. I agree that no one needs to have their life ruined over this, and I agree that showing a full photo ID is not just unethical but should be illegal. PM me if you want my wife's name to google for the example I gave above. She is in fact one of the web-wife models featured in my galleries here. ;-) -Dave |
Hey guys, I have moved this post to a thread of itself, since i think it deserves a thread to be discussed separately
To me as long as you "expose" your own wife there is no problem at all with it as long as she allows it and its your thing, what bugs me is when people "expose" other people without their knowledge and consent that's why i ban accounts left and right when i see IDs/and so on, if you have the approval of the other party, you can get your account verified and then you can go on a posting spree. else each such account endangers identity of a person who has no clue his information is being posted here, and I do not want to see that to endanger the person and our site as well. |
Quote:
Thank you! -Dave |
Who has an opinion on the "Exposure Manifesto" craze?
https://pimpandhost.com/album/92669462 Please note; I did not create any of the "Manifesto" collages I post here. I collected the more interesting ones to me, and I post them now just as an example fore this conversation. |
Quote:
Just my opinion though....I have a few ex's that would not hesitate to try to get some revenge along that line. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Notwithstanding, the repetitive posts of their pictures is, well, banal.... |
How about the doxing that's happening today? In most places that is illegal, but is pomp&host doing anything activily for that?
I thought it was required to remove those (eg by means of supervising) just to not get into troubles (like xhmster had) Any ideas on doxing here? |
Quote:
Xhamster got ridiculous with shutting down their user functions to curb this instead of monitoring it and deleting violators. They cut stories, blogs, pictures in private messages and other functions. I did their verification to continue to play, then they wanted a bunch more info to be able to post more content. Basically you had to want to make $ as a porn actor / cam girl for it to be worth it. That’s when I deleted many years worth of pictures & videos and moved on to P&H |
Quote:
But here are a few pictures which are too reveiling and I want them removed. I did flag them already, but doe flagging or even contacting here help? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree that this falls into a socially irresponsible category, revenge porn as Amateurkitty said, and I believe that "exposure of the unwitting" is unethical. (I have now locked those galleries I have posted as examples.) To Hepcat940's point of "banal" - many of these "propagators" get their kick from being part of spreading the unwitting models' material, gaining a sense of helping to secure the indelibility of their internet presence. A profound aspect of candaulism is the "unknowingly" part. Please know that there ARE SOME UNICORNS out there; and I know some from each category: 1. Couples of man and wife where both parties are equally interested and involved in promoting and publishing the beauty of the wife to anyone who has interest 2. Solo women who feel as above, they enjoy showing- off 3. Women who were themself exposed and now get a kick from exposing OTHER women in this "webslut" culture For my own part, I am a fairly normal perv; I like ANYTHING AMATEUR. |
For my wife's pictures guitarsg69@gmail.com
|
⬅️🦄
I post up a lot of personal stuff when I’m playing with myself. Putting myself out there makes me orgasm faster/harder. Then sanity returns after the orgasm subsides and I take it down 🤣 Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
(c) www.Pimpandhost.com